Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urban Developments today are suffering an identity crisis.Market demands have led to a globalized urban standard, one of mixed-use.The 'mixed'-use model fails to mix anything in a meaningful way.The result is a packaged, off-the-shelf and easy to implement 'canned' urbanism.As a capital city, should Ottawa be concerned with how the built environment reflects its identity?Tunney's Pasture is far from the rolling meadows its name suggests.Instead, it is an outof-date idea of a government campus built in the 1950's.Today, Tunney's is seen as 'a wasteland.'New proposals fail to realize the site's potential.The Tunney's Pasture Master Plan will be critiqued as an example of a canned urban approach.An alternative proposal will be put forward: one based on principles different from globalization and mixed-use, that consider instead identity, historical context and the site's pastoral origins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.107 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.028 | 0.022 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.026 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".