MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082113466 · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.140

Clinical Management of Hyper Matured Cataract in a Labrador Dog

2020· article· en· W3082113466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benudhar Mahanand, Jayakrushna Das, Aditya Prasad Acharya, Ritun Patra

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptometryMedicineOphthalmologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 5 years old female Labrador retriever dog was presented for treatment of blindness. From history it was known that the animal progressively developed gradual loss of vision since last one year to complete blindness. Upon physical and clinicalexamination, it revealed bilateralcataract and was confirmed by ultrasonography examination and referred for cataract surgery by small incision cataract surgery (SICS) technique. After removal of cataractous lens one rigid polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) 41 Diopter (D) intra-ocular lens (IOL) was implanted and the animal regained normal vision after 7days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied SciencesSame topicIntraocular Surgery and LensesFrench-language works237,207