Toward universal substituent constants: Model chemistry sensitivity of descriptors from the quantum theory of atoms in molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) provides a theoretical foundation to determine the properties of functional groups through additive atomic contributions. Many studies have used QTAIM in their analyses with a variety of electronic structure methods, but it is unknown if the properties measured using one model chemistry, the combination of the electronic structure method and basis set, can be compared to those measured by another. Here, we evaluate the sensitivity of QTAIM functional group and bond critical point properties using six functionals and seven basis sets. High-level B2PLYPD3-BJ/aug-cc-pV5Z reference values are provided for 116 functional groups and the property sensitivity with respect to these values are evaluated based on absolute deviations and by assessing linear relationships. Functional group properties, including charges, dipoles, quadrupoles and volumes, were found to be mostly insensitive to choice of computational model chemistry. However, due to structural and topological inconsistencies, the 6-31G(d) basis set is not recommended for use. Bond critical point properties varied with choice of model chemistry, but models incorporating hybrid functionals and triple-ζ basis sets provided values suitable for use in regression studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".