Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation for Activities of Daily Living
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents a modelling approach to predict the blood pressure (BP) waveform time series during activities of daily living without the use of a traditional pressure cuff. A nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous inputs (NARX) is implemented using artificial neural networks and trained to predict the BP waveform time series from electrocardiography (ECG) and forehead photoplethysmography (PPG) input signals. To broaden the range of blood pressures present in the training set, a protocol was implemented that included sitting, standing, walking, Valsalva manoeuvers, and static handgrip exercise. A five-minute interval of data in the sitting position at the end of the day was also used for training. The efficacy of the cuffless BP method for continuous BP estimation over 4.67 hours was evaluated on 3 participants for varying training data segments. A mean absolute error of 6.3 and 5.2 mmHg were achieved for systolic BP and diastolic BP estimates, respectively. Including static handgrips and Valsalva manoeuvers in the training dataset leads to better estimation of the higher ranges of BP observed throughout the day. The proposed method shows potential for estimating the range of BP experienced during activities of daily living.Clinical Relevance- Establishes a method for cuffless continuous blood pressure estimation during activities of daily living that can be used for continuous monitoring and acute hypertension detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".