MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data based sensing of Shale Oil yield in Oil Shale Retorting process

2020· article· en· W3082200407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hasan Qayyum Chohan, Iftikhar Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleRetortShell in situ conversion processShale oil extractionOil shale gasShale oilPetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilGeologyKerogenFossil fuelMining engineeringEnvironmental scienceWaste managementSource rockEngineeringStructural basinPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oil shale is sedimentary organic rocks that are being converted into useful shale oil and shale gas. North American regions, Canada and China are exploring the oil shale reserves to accommodate the depletion of natural oil and gas resources. Oil shale retorting technology is being utilized to convert the shale rocks into shale oil and shale gas. The major product is oil that is further treated to convert it into gaseous form. In this study, machine learning techniques like ensemble learning (least square boosting and bagging) and artificial neural network (ANN) are employed for data sensing of oil shale retorting process and being compared. Data is generated for ensemble models through MATLAB-Excel-Aspen interfacing. The proposed framework shows that ANN provides higher accuracy as compare to other models for oil shale retorting process for efficient oil recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207