MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082251073 · doi:10.4153/s0008439520000715

Lineability, continuity, and antiderivatives in the non-Archimedean setting

2020· article· en· W3082251073 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Khodabandehlou, S. Maghsoudi, Juan B. Seoane‐Sepúlveda

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
Topicadvanced mathematical theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRange (aeronautics)Pure mathematicsAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work focuses on the ongoing research of lineability (the search for large linear structures within certain non-linear sets) in non-Archimedean frameworks. Among several other results, we show that there exist large linear structures inside each of the following sets: (i) functions with a fixed closed subset of continuity, (ii) all continuous functions that are not Darboux continuous (or vice versa), (iii) all functions whose Dieudonné integral does not behave as an antiderivative, and (iv) functions with finite range and having antiderivative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicadvanced mathematical theoriesFrench-language works237,207