Factors associated with sexual satisfaction in mixed-sex long-distance and geographically close relationships
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous research indicates that relationship maintenance behaviours are linked to relationship satisfaction. This study investigated the extent to which six relationship maintenance behaviours and nine sexual maintenance behaviours contribute to relationship and sexual satisfaction in long-distance relationships (LDRs) and geographically close relationships (GCRs). Based on online survey data, all of the relationship maintenance behaviours and sexual maintenance behaviours were positively correlated with satisfaction. Four of the relationship maintenance behaviours were uniquely associated with relationship satisfaction. Two of the sexual maintenance behaviours were uniquely associated with satisfaction outcomes. Neither gender nor relationship type moderated any associations. These results suggest the relationship maintenance framework should be expanded to include sexual behaviours and that relationship maintenance behaviours can also be considered as sexual maintenance behaviours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it