MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082429380 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2020.11.0012

Enrichment Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes during Endosperm Grouting Periods in Non-waxy and Waxy Foxtail Millets

2020· article· en· W3082429380 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiang Li, Tao Li, Y. Bai, Xingcong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEndospermGeneTranscriptomeWaxy cornMetabolic pathwayJaponicaKEGGFood scienceBotanyStarchGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The content of amylose and amylopectin is an important trait affecting cooking and eating quality in millet. During process of kernel grouting, the synthesis of starch involves different pathways and components in non-waxy and waxy millets. Immature grouting grains of waxy millet ‘Gonggu68’ and non-waxy millet ‘Chigu4’ (grouting period 1 and 5 days) were used to analyze their transcriptome sequences by using Illumina Hiseq4000. The results showed that: (1) GBSSⅠ enzymes activity of waxy and non-waxy millet was low-high-low. There were some differences between the two activities. 665 upregulated differentially expressed genes were screened on day 5 and day 1 during grouting period in waxy cultivar ‘Gonggu68’, there were 431 more upregulated genes than downregulated genes. There were 97 more up-regulated genes than down-regulated genes in non-waxy cultivar ‘Chigu4’ on day 5 and day 1 in grouting period. (2) In the A 2 -VS-A 1 waxy comparison group, the differential genes were mainly GO enriched in 7 functions such as the seed oil body biogenic function, 17-β-ketosteroid reductase activity function and so on. it was mainly enriched in biological processes and molecular functions. In the B 2 -VS-B 1 non-waxy comparison group, the differential genes were mainly GO enriched in 8 functions such as the light capturing function and the pigment binding function in the light system I for non-waxy millet. (3) Differentially expressed genes were mainly KEGG enriched in caffeine metabolism pathway, linoleic acid metabolism pathway, anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, aflatoxin biosynthesis pathway in waxy A 2 -VS-A 1 , but which were mainly KEGG enriched in the synergy-antenna protein pathway, the linoleic acid metabolic pathway, the caffeine metabolic pathway, the brassinosteroid biopathway in non-waxy B 2 -VS-B 1 . These two comparative groups were enriched Caffeine metabolism pathway and linoleic acid metabolism pathway appeared in the process. (4) Three ( SSII-3 , PHO1 , AS ) and four ( PHO1-1 , AS , AGP16 , WAXY ) genes with significant differences and related to waxy and non-waxy millet were screened. With Actin (Si001873) as the internal reference gene, the above seven differentially expressed genes were verified by qRT-PCR, which was consistent with the transcriptome results, indicating that the differentially expressed genes were related to waxy or non-waxy endosperm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207