MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Multi-Level Simulation Scheme for 2D Material-Based Nanoelectronics

2020· article· en· W3082497026 on OpenAlexaff
Yiju Zhao, Youngki Yoon, Lan Wei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoelectronicsBenchmark (surveying)Electronic circuitTransistorVoltageElectronic engineeringLogic gateComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a scheme of multi-level simulation for 2D material-based nanodevices, which includes material parameterization, non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) device simulation, physics-based compact model, and circuit performance benchmark. A modified virtual source (VS) compact model is developed to capture unique carrier velocity and charge characteristics of 2D materials based on the quantum transport simulation results. HSPICE simulation is then performed for circuit analysis and device-circuit co-optimization. Using this framework, we achieve a minimum energy-delay product for germanane (GeH) field-effect transistor (FET) benchmark circuits by engineering power supply voltage and threshold voltage. The demonstrated multi-level process bridges the gap between device characteristics and circuit behaviors of 2D nanoelectronics, making it possible to evaluate 2D material-based electronic circuits on a solid foundation of unique 2D materials and their device physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207