MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082508458 · doi:10.31743/vp.7167

Immagine evangelica di Maria madre di Gesù nei primi tre secoli

2003· article· pl· W3082508458 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Nyk

Bibliographic record

VenueVox Patrum · 2003
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maryja, matka Jezusa z Nazaretu, jest czczona przede wszystkim jako Bogurodzica, czyli theotokos, co jest terminem zaaprobowanym na Soborze Efeskim w 431 roku. Niektórzy teolodzy utrzymują, iż tytuł ten był używany w stosunku do matki Jezusa już znacznie wcześniej. W niniejszym artykule analizujemy, czy rzeczywiście był on używany w pierwszych trzech wiekach; zatrzymujemy się tutaj nad sposobem w jakim Maryja jest przedstawiana przez autorów chrześcijańskich w tym okresie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVox PatrumSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207