MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082621001

ІКОНА КИЄВО-БРАТСЬКОЇ БОГОРОДИЦІ З КОЛЕКЦІЇ НАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО МУЗЕЮ ІСТОРІЇ УКРАЇНИ XVIII СТ.: ПОХОДЖЕННЯ, АТРИБУЦІЯ ТА ІСТОРІЯ

2017· article· uk· W3082621001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ярослав Затилюк

Bibliographic record

VenueНауковий вісник Національного музею історії України · 2017
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicDiverse Scientific Research in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconPeriod (music)UkrainianCultArtArt historyAttributionQuarter (Canadian coin)Visual artsHistoryAncient historyArchaeologyPhilosophyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this article is to explore the origin and attribution of the Kyiv-Brotherhood Virgin Mary icon preserved in the collection of the National Museum of Ukrainian History. This icon is a copy of a legendary miraculous image from the mid-17th century. The author commented on the museum records, conducted expert evaluation of the icon, and compared it to the other icons created at the same period. The author claims that the icon originated from the Poltava region suggests several hypotheses about the Kyiv origin of the artist, and puts forward a hypothesis about its creation in the first quarter of the eighteenth century as well as its direct following the patterns of the original iconographic prototype. Keywords: Kyiv-Brothehood Virgin Mary, cult, icon, museum accounting-records, origins, attribution, dating, iconographic, art school

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueНауковий вісник Національного музею історії УкраїниSame topicDiverse Scientific Research in UkraineFrench-language works237,207