Relationship of the Respiration Waveform to a Chest Worn Inertial Sensor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demand of portable health monitoring has been growing due to increasing cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. While both cardiovascular monitoring and respiratory monitoring have been developed independently, there lacks a simple integrated solution to monitor both simultaneously. Seismocardiography (SCG), a method of recording cardiac vibrations with an accelerometer can also be used to extract respiratory information via low frequency chest oscillations. This study used an inertial measurement unit which pairs a 3-axis accelerometer and a 3-axis gyroscope to monitor respiration while maintaining optimum placement protocol for recording SCG. Additionally, the connection between inertial measurement and both respiratory rate and volume were explored based on their correlation with a Spirometer. Respiratory volume was shown to have moderate correlation with chest motion with an average best-case correlation coefficient of 0.679 across acceleration and gyration. The techniques described will assist the design of future SCG algorithms by understanding the sources behind their modulation from respiration. This paper shows that a simplified processing technique can be added to SCG algorithms for respiration monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".