On the Ground Potentials and Grounding Circuits of Transformerless Grid-Connected Multilevel Power Electronic Converters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformerless grid-connected power electronic converters (PECs) are used in photovoltaic systems, motor drives, and solid-state power transformers. In these applications, transformerless grid-connected multilevel PECs can reduce harmonic distortions, increase power, and voltage ratings. This article aims to develop models for the ground potentials in these PECs, and to design grounding circuits for them. The models for ground potentials are developed using the common-mode voltages across each leg of the multilevel PEC. Grounding circuits for transformerless grid-connected multilevel PECs are designed using frequency selective circuits to limit ground potentials, and block ground currents from flowing through grounding of the host grid. The developed models, and grounding circuits are evaluated for transformerless grid connected, diode clamped, flying capacitor, and cascaded H-bridge multilevel PECs under different operating conditions. Test results demonstrate the significant advantages of the frequency-selective grounding for transformerless grid-connected PECs. Observed advantages include reduced harmonic distortion, minimized ground potentials, and improved efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".