Evidence of near year-around spawning in Atlantic cod off southern Newfoundland: implications for management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Management of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) off southern Newfoundland (Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) Subdivision 3Ps) entails allocated quotas and restrictions on fishing during late winter and springtime to protect presumed spawning aggregations. We present data collected from research trawls and handlines (1995–2014) indicating spawning inshore may occur near year-around with limited resting from December to February and with more contracted spring spawning possible offshore. A mixed general linear model with binomial error, using year as a random factor, recognized month and length as significant impacts on proportions of females spawning, but not gear or inshore–offshore location. Composite data indicated that females in spawning condition may be present inshore (∼10%–20% of adult females) from March to October. During 1997–1999, with 8–9 months sampled each year, protracted annual spawning schedules and interannual variability were evident. At present, the fishery primarily employs gillnets inshore and otter trawls offshore, with spring spawning closures offering only partial and inconsistent protection. Behavioural interference might be reduced by employing less intrusive longlines, as historically practiced in this fishery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".