MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Securing the Authentication Process of LTE Base Stations

2020· article· en· W3082746435 on OpenAlexaff
Adegoke Babajide Seyi, Fehmi Jafaar, Ron Ruhl

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security
Canadian institutionsComputer Research Institute of MontréalConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase stationComputer scienceAuthentication (law)Computer networkComputer securityConfidentialityKey (lock)Mobile telephonyProcess (computing)LTE AdvancedTelecommunicationsMobile radioTelecommunications link

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Securing sensitive information like the International Mobile Subscriber Identity has been a challenge on all generations of mobile telecommunication networks, i.e., 2G, 3G and 4G. In fact, many cases of compromising users' privacy in telecom networks have been reported such as the cases of rogue base stations capable of tracking, intercepting and collecting the sensitive data without the users' knowledge. To overcome these issues, we are proposing in this paper the use of a pre-shared key in the authentication process of Long-Term Evolution (LTE) base stations to local users. We are proposing a first hop authentication procedure to verify if the base station is legitimate by the User Equipment. We simulate our approach using the NetSim simulated environment to show how it is improving the data confidentiality in LTE networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 International Conference on Electrical, Communication, and Computer Engineering (ICECCE)Same topicAdvanced Authentication Protocols SecurityFrench-language works237,207