MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082765896 · doi:10.1113/ep088639

Peripheral chemoresponsiveness during exercise in male athletes with exercise‐induced arterial hypoxaemia

2020· article· en· W3082765896 on OpenAlexaff
Emily A. Granger, T. K. Cooper, Susan R. Hopkins, Donald C. McKenzie, Paolo B. Dominelli

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsHypercapniaHyperoxiaMedicinePeripheralArterial bloodAnesthesiaCardiologyHypoxemiaPhysical exerciseHypoxia (environmental)Respiratory minute volumeInternal medicineOxygen saturationRespiratory systemPhysical therapyLungOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Do highly trained male endurance athletes who develop exercise‐induced arterial hypoxaemia (EIAH) demonstrate reduced peripheral chemoresponsiveness during exercise? What is the main finding and its importance? Those with the lowest arterial saturation during exercise have a smaller ventilatory response to hypercapnia during exercise. There was no significant relationship between the hyperoxic ventilatory response and EIAH. The findings suggest that peripheral chemoresponsiveness to hypercapnia during exercise could play a role in the development of EIAH. The findings improve our understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to EIAH. Abstract Exercise‐induced arterial hypoxaemia (EIAH) is characterized by a decrease in arterial oxygen tension and/or saturation during whole‐body exercise, which may in part result from inadequate alveolar ventilation. However, the role of peripheral chemoresponsiveness in the development of EIAH is not well established. We hypothesized that those with the most severe EIAH would have an attenuated ventilatory response to hyperoxia and hypercapnia during exercise. To evaluate this, on separate days, we measured ventilatory sensitivity to hyperoxia and separately hypercapnia at rest and during three different exercise intensities (25, 50% of and ventilatory threshold (∼67% of )) in 12 males cyclists ( = 66.6 ± 4.7 ml kg −1 min −1 ). Subjects were divided into two groups based on their end‐exercise arterial oxygen saturation (ear oximetry, ): a normal oxyhaemoglobin saturation group (NOS, = 93.4 ± 0.4%, n = 5) and a low oxyhaemoglobin saturation group (LOS, = 89.9 ± 0.9%, n = 7). There was no difference in (66.4 ± 2.9 vs . 66.8 ± 6.0 ml kg −1 min −1 , respectively, P = 0.9), peak ventilation during maximal exercise (182 ± 15 vs . 197 ± 32 l min −1 , respectively, P = 0.36) or ventilatory response to hyperoxia ( P = 0.98) at any exercise intensity between NOS and LOS groups. However, those in the LOS group had a significantly lower ventilatory response to hypercapnia ( P = 0.004, (η 2 = 0.18). There was also a significant relationship between the mean hypercapnic response and end‐exercise ( r = 0.75, P = 0.009) but not between the mean hyperoxic response and end‐exercise ( r = 0.21, P = 0.51). A blunted hypercapnic ventilatory response may contribute to EIAH in highly trained men due to a failure to increase ventilation sufficiently to offset exercise‐induced gas exchange impairments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207