MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082770156 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3020891

Model-Based Secure Load Frequency Control of Smart Grids Against Data Integrity Attack

2020· article· en· W3082770156 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Yang, Shichao Liu, Chao Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersBeijing Nova ProgramBeijing Municipal Commission of EducationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSCADACyber-physical systemSmart gridElectric power systemData integrityDynamic demandRobustness (evolution)Overhead (engineering)Real-time computingPower (physics)EngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a cyber-physical digital signature creation method and a resilient load frequency control approach are proposed to improve the security of the existing SCADA protocols used in the load frequency control of interconnected power systems. In specific, the dynamic model of the power system is used to predict the future states of the system and the statistics of a number of future states are calculated and used as the dynamic hash to determine the integrity of the data communicated between remote telemetry units and the power system SCADA control center. The proposed algorithm has inherently the cyber-physical characteristics and enhanced robustness to collisions without adding a larger overhead to the message frame of the packets in current SCADA protocols. To compensate for the possible performance degradation and instability of the power system caused by corrupted data, a model-based resilient load frequency controller is designed for the smart grid. The maximum interval between two consecutive feedback updates in the model-based control scheme is obtained for securing the stability of the power system. The investigation of three types of integrity attacks on a two-area power system shows that the proposed model-based digital signature attack detection scheme is able to detect even a little inconsistency of the communicated data. By using the designed resilient load frequency controller, the stability and dynamic performance of the smart grid are guaranteed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207