MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3082801189 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1191

AzTEC survey of the central molecular zone: data reduction, analysis, and preliminary results

2021· article· en· W3082801189 on OpenAlexaff
Yuping Tang, Q. Daniel Wang, G. W. Wilson, M. H. Heyer, Robert Gutermuth, P. Schloerb, Min S. Yun, John Bally, Laurent Loinard, Sergiy Silich, M. Chávez, Daryl Haggard, Alfredo Montaña, David Sánchez-Argüelles, M. Zeballos, Jorge A. Zavala, J. León-Tavares

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEntomological Society of AmericaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsDeconvolutionMillimeterGalaxyTelescopeSpectral energy distributionAngular resolution (graph drawing)Spectral indexPhotometry (optics)AmplitudeAstronomySpectral lineOpticsStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present a large-scale survey of the central molecular zone (CMZ) of our Galaxy, as well as a monitoring program of Sgr A*, with the AzTEC/Large Millimeter Telescope in the 1.1 mm continuum. Our 1.1 mm map covers the main body of the CMZ over a field of 1.6 × 1.1 deg2 with an angular resolution of 10.5 arcsec and a depth of 15 mJy beam−1. To account for the intensity loss due to the background removal process, we combine this map with lower resolution CSO/Bolocam and Planck/HFI data to produce an effective full intensity 1.1 mm continuum map. With this map and existing Herschel surveys, we have carried out a comprehensive analysis of the spectral energy distribution of dust in the CMZ. A key component of this analysis is the implementation of a model-based deconvolution approach, incorporating the Point Spread Functions (PSFs) of the different instruments, and hence recovering a significant amount of spatial information on angular scales larger than 10.5 arcsec. The monitoring of Sgr A* was carried out as part of a worldwide, multiwavelength campaign when the so-called G2 object was undergoing the pericentre passage around the massive black hole. Our preliminary results include (1) high-resolution maps of column density, temperature and dust spectral index across the CMZ; (2) a 1.1 mm light curve of Sgr A* showing an outburst of $140{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ maximum amplitude on 2014 May 9th May, 2014 but otherwise only stochastic variations of $10{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ and no systematic long-term change, consistent with other observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207