Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les pompiers et paramédics du Québec acquièrent une acuité visuelle spécifique, un regard expert. Ce regard expert est à la fois une technique du corps efficace pour percevoir les signes et symptômes des patients et à la fois porteur d’une vision du monde. À partir de données ethnographiques, cet article s’intéressera à ce regard expert sous deux angles. Premièrement, nous analyserons l’acquisition de cette technique du corps et sa pertinence en intervention, plus particulièrement pour l’élaboration d’hypothèses diagnostiques. Deuxièmement, nous montrerons comment les perceptions sensorielles et leurs mémorisations peuvent être marquées par les contextes d’urgence tout autant que par la lenteur des interventions non urgentes et des périodes d’attente entre les appels. Nous conclurons en portant un regard réflexif sur les transformations perceptuelles vécues en tant qu’anthropologue sur le terrain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.046 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".