MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT109: A phase I/Ib study evaluating GDC-0077 plus fulvestrant in patients with <i>PIK3CA</i>-mutant, hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

2020· article· en· W3082840399 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Kalinsky, Dejan Juric, Philippe L. Bédard, Mafalda Oliveira, Andrés Cervantes, Erika Hamilton, Ian E. Krop, Peter Schmid, Andréa Varga, Antoîne Italiano, Zachary Veitch, Cristina Saura, Valentina Gambardella, Sravanthi Cheeti, Naoki Kotani, Guiyuan Lei, Katherine E. Hutchinson, Stephanie Royer‐Joo, Anjali Vaze, Jennifer L. Schutzman, Komal Jhaveri

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFulvestrantAdverse effectBreast cancerPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsInternal medicineCancerCmaxDysgeusiaOncologyPharmacologyEstrogen receptorGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: PIK3CA encodes the PI3K p110α subunit, and dysregulating mutations are widely seen in breast cancer (BC) and other solid tumors. GDC-0077 (G) is a potent p110α-selective inhibitor that degrades mutant p110α and demonstrates antitumor activity in PIK3CA-mutant BC xenograft models, either as a single agent, or combined with anti-estrogen therapy. From an ongoing, open-label, phase I/Ib dose-escalation study of G alone and combined with endocrine + targeted therapies (NCT03006172), we present data of G + fulvestrant (F) in postmenopausal patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutant, hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative BC, including a food-effect assessment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of G. Methods: Safety (NCI-CTCAE v4), PK, and preliminary antitumor activity (clinical benefit rate [CBR]: RECIST v1.1 stable disease for ≥24 weeks, partial response [PR], or complete response) of 9 mg oral once-daily G + 500 mg intramuscular F on Day 1 (and Day 15 of Cycle 1) of 28-day cycles were assessed until intolerable toxicity/disease progression. The effect of a standard high-fat meal on the PK of G was evaluated after a single dose and at steady state. Relevant signaling and pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers were assessed using circulating tumor (ct) DNA samples. Results: At clinical cutoff (Jul 19, 2019), 20 pts were enrolled in the food-effect portion of the G + F arm. Fifteen (75%) had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy for metastatic BC. Median G treatment duration was 5.9 months (range 1.7-17.8); cumulative dose intensity, 98%. Adverse events (AEs) led to dose reduction in 3 pts (15%). The most common treatment-related (TR) AEs (≥4 pts, 20%) were hyperglycemia (11, 55%), diarrhea (10, 50%), stomatitis (grouped term; 9, 45%), nausea (8, 40%), decreased appetite (7, 35%), dysgeusia, fatigue, and muscle spasms (4 each, 20%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs were hyperglycemia, nausea, lymphopenia, hyperamylasemia, and hyperlipasemia (1 each, 5%). The PK of G in combination with F was similar to single-agent PK. Comparable G exposures (Cmax and AUC0-24) were observed following administration in fasted or fed states. Seventeen pts (85%) discontinued treatment, all due to radiographic/clinical disease progression. Overall, 5/14 pts with measurable disease had a PR (36%; 2 received prior F; 4, prior CDK4/6i), of whom 2 pts (14%) had a confirmed PR. CBR was 60% (12/20 pts). Most pts showed decreased ctDNA PIK3CA-mutant allele frequency during treatment. Conclusion: G + F demonstrated a manageable safety profile, similar PK to G alone, preliminary antitumor activity, and PD modulation of PIK3CA-mutant allele frequency in ctDNA. The presence of food did not significantly impact the rate or extent of G absorption following single or multiple doses. Additional pts are being enrolled in the G + F arm to further inform the safety and efficacy of this combination. Citation Format: Kevin Kalinsky, Dejan Juric, Philippe L. Bedard, Mafalda Oliveira, Andres Cervantes, Erika Hamilton, Ian E. Krop, Nick Turner, Peter Schmid, Andrea Varga, Antoine Italiano, Zachary Veitch, Cristina Saura, Valentina Gambardella, Sravanthi Cheeti, Naoki Kotani, Guiyuan Lei, Katherine E. Hutchinson, Stephanie Royer-Joo, Anjali Vaze, Jennifer L. Schutzman, Komal Jhaveri. A phase I/Ib study evaluating GDC-0077 plus fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutant, hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT109.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207