An extension of LDEO5 model for ENSO ensemble predictions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study provided an extension to the latest version of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observation (LDEO5) prediction system. First, an ensemble coupled data assimilation (CDA) system, based on the Ensemble Kalman Filter, was established. Both the Kaplan sea surface temperature (SST) data from January 1856 to December 2018 and the ECMWF twentieth century reanalysis (ERA-20C) wind data from January 1900 to February 2010 were assimilated for prediction initialization. Second, an ensemble prediction (EP) system was established using stochastic optimal perturbation that represented the uncertainty in the physical process. The assimilation experiments showed that assimilating multi-source data yielded better results than assimilating single-source data. The analyses of Niño3.4 SST anomalies and zonal wind stress (ZWS) anomalies were in good agreement with the observed counterparts, respectively. The root mean square errors of both Niño3.4 SST anomalies and ZWS anomalies were found to be significantly reduced, compared to the values obtained before assimilation. The modeled upper layer depth anomalies along the equator, and subsurface temperature anomalies in the Niño3.4 region were also found to be similar to the observed counterparts. A long-term ensemble hindcast was conducted using the EP system for the past 163 years, from January 1856 to December 2018. Results showed that the predictions initialized by assimilating multi-source data yielded best deterministic skill, reaching the international advanced level. A comparative analysis revealed that the EP system predicted the warm events well, followed by cold and neutral events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".