Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Is War by Hannah Moscovitch was produced by the University of Calgary Drama Division in the School of Creative and Performing Arts. It was presented in The University Theatre from October 18th to 26th, 2019. This artist statement is a critical reflection of the creative process leading up to the production, the production itself, and the audience response to the production. Chapter One describes how I first came to be aware of the play, what drew me to be interested in directing it, and what major themes and questions I explored throughout the creative process. The second chapter contextualizes the play within my research, detailing my focus on trauma as a central element to understanding the script. Chapter Three analyzes my working relationship with the production’s designers and explores the decision-making processes that led to our final designs. The fourth chapter outlines the approach from preparation for rehearsal, auditions, rehearsals, and into performance. Chapter Three and Chapter Four also detail in-process discoveries and learnings. The fifth chapter summarizes the audience response to the production as captured through post-show surveys and forum discussions. The final chapter reflects on the primary lessons of the overall process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".