Disentangling time series between brain tissues improves fMRI data quality using a time-dependent deep neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) is a prominent imaging technique to probe brain function, however, a substantial proportion of noise from multiple sources influences the reliability and reproducibility of fMRI data analysis and limits its clinical applications. Extensive effort has been devoted to improving fMRI data quality, but in the last two decades, there is no consensus reached which technique is more effective. In this study, we developed a novel deep neural network for denoising fMRI data, named denoising neural network (DeNN). This deep neural network is 1) applicable without requiring externally recorded data to model noise; 2) spatially and temporally adaptive to the variability of noise in different brain regions at different time points; 3) automated to output denoised data without manual interference; 4) trained and applied on each subject separately and 5) insensitive to the repetition time (TR) of fMRI data. When we compared DeNN with a number of nuisance regression methods for denoising fMRI data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, only DeNN had connectivity for functionally uncorrelated regions close to zero and successfully identified unbiased correlations between the posterior cingulate cortex seed and multiple brain regions within the default mode network or task positive network. The whole brain functional connectivity maps computed with DeNN-denoised data are approximately three times as homogeneous as the functional connectivity maps computed with raw data. Furthermore, the improved homogeneity strengthens rather than weakens the statistical power of fMRI in detecting intrinsic functional differences between cognitively normal subjects and subjects with Alzheimer's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".