MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083037454 · doi:10.1177/2051415820954768

Computed tomography urography findings of complete inguinoscrotal bladder herniation

2020· article· en· W3083037454 on OpenAlexaff
Vibeeshan Jegatheeswaran, Ivan Diamond, Munir Jamal, Yingming Amy Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Urology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiologyHydronephrosisPyelogramInguinal herniaObstructive uropathyMagnetic resonance imagingCystographyHerniaSurgical planningComputed tomographySurgeryUrinary system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inguinoscrotal bladder herniation (IBH) is a rare type of inguinal hernia associated with significant urologic complications such as acute renal failure, hydronephrosis, obstructive uropathy, and sepsis. Diagnosis of this condition can be made with common imaging modalities including excretory urography, retrograde cystography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. We present the classic symptomatology and imaging findings of inguinoscrotal bladder herniation on CT urogram in two patients. Although the majority of IBH are diagnosed intraoperatively, radiologists and the surgical team should be aware of this diagnosis when working up a patient, as preoperative diagnosis is crucial to assist with surgical planning and avoid intraoperative complications. Level of evidence: 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical UrologySame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207