Cryptanalysis of RSA: Integer Prime Factorization Using Genetic Algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, researchers have been exploring alternative methods to solving Integer Prime Factorization, the decomposition of an integer into its prime factors. This has direct application to cryptanalysis of RSA, as one means of breaking such a cryptosystem requires factorization of a large number that is the product of two prime numbers. This paper applies three different genetic algorithms to solve this issue, utilizing mathematical knowledge concerning distribution of primes to improve the algorithms. The best of the three genetic algorithms has a chromosome that represents m in the equation prime = 6 m ± 1, and is able to factor a number of up to 22 decimal digits. This is a significantly larger number than the largest factored by comparable methods in earlier work. This leads to the conclusion that approaches such as genetic algorithms are a promising avenue of research into the problem of integer factorization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it