MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083058172 · doi:10.18280/acsm.440306

Diffusion Model for Simulating the Kinetics of Boronizing Process in the Case of FeB/Fe2B Bilayer Configuration

2020· article· en· W3083058172 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Omar Belguendouz, Bendaoud Mebarek, М. Кеддам, Yassine El Guerri

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetal Alloys Wear and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBilayerDiffusionKineticsDiffusion processProcess (computing)Materials scienceChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsOperating systemMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we developed a diffusion model based on the second Fick's law and the solving of the mass balance equations of the (FeB/Fe2B) interface to simulate the boronizing kinetics in the case of bilayer configuration (FeB/Fe2B) formed on AISI D2 steel. It is known that the boronizing process is a thermochemical surface treatment generally carried out at temperatures ranging between 1223 K and 1323 K. The knowledge of the temperature and the processing time are necessary to simulate and optimize the boronizing process. The developed model in this study is used to estimate the value of the growth rate constant in each phase, to simulate the boride layer thickness formed on AISI D2 steel, to determine the boron concentration profile and to evaluate the mass gain at the surface of the borided AISI D2 steel. To validate the developed model, we used the experimental data taken from the literature concerning the layers thicknesses of FeB and Fe2B layers obtained for different process parameters. Finally, these experimental values are compared to the calculated results. A good agreement was observed between the simulated results and the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicMetal Alloys Wear and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207