MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083067453 · doi:10.1353/jhs.2019.0030

Edwidge Danticat: The Haitian Diasporic Imaginary by Nadège T. Clitandre

2019· article· en· W3083067453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jana Evans Braziel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Haitian studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryDiasporaHomelandGeopoliticsTrope (literature)SociologyPostcolonialism (international relations)HistoryPoliticsLiteratureAnthropologyGender studiesArtPsychoanalysisPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Edwidge Danticat: The Haitian Diasporic Imaginary by Nadège T. Clitandre Jana Evans Braziel Edwidge Danticat: The Haitian Diasporic Imaginary. By Nadège T. Clitandre. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2018. New World Studies. ISBN- 10: 0813941873. 272 pp. US $29.50, paperback. Edwidge Danticat: The Haitian Diasporic Imaginary, Nadège T. Clitandre's first book, published by the University of Virginia Press in 2018, is a comprehensive analysis of the literary oeuvre of the Haitian American writer Edwidge Danticat. Clitandre explores the "tropic permutation[s] of [End Page 290] echo" (5), the Ovidian myth of Echo and Narcissus, and the philosophical reverberations of echo (notably, Édouard Glissant's echo-monde) as a trope for the "doublings" of home and diaspora, local and global, and literary and material registers in Danticat's literary corpus. Situated at the theoretical interstices of globalization, postcolonialism, diasporas, and Black feminist thought, Clitandre's intellectual project foregrounds the geopolitical dimensions of the local and the national (Haiti) to render global insights; in the process, she also meditates on the tenuous and perilous nature of borders; the long-distance tentacles of nations in diaspora; and the literary as a lens into material and political, indeed arduous realities. As an extended case study that proffers global lessons, Clitandre writes, Danticat's "reconstitution of nation through a diasporic imaginary" (3) allows her readers to discern and reimagine the complicated and deterritorialized terrains of diasporas, the transnational engagements with home and homeland, the interstitial border zones across geopolitical boundaries, and the fractured and fragmented lenses wrought by the multifarious fissures of globalization, international migration, landlocked fixity, impoverished immobility, and the hard lived realities of neoliberal economics. Of note is the book's appendix, a dialogic conversation, as Clitandre closes her brilliant first book with an interview with Danticat herself. The discussion moves across a wide range of literary and political issues pertaining to nation and diaspora. Clitandre's and Danticat's voices thus register two voices in this polyphonic community. Given the book's essential and riveting contribution to contextualizing Danticat's work in its multiple connections to feminism, philosophy, politics, psychology, and religion, what follows is a thorough summary and assessment of each part. Clitandre's "Introduction" places Danticat's literary oeuvre in several theoretical contexts—classical myth and literature, Lacanian psychoanalysis, diaspora and diasporic studies, globalization and the global imaginary, Caribbean feminism, and, more broadly, African diasporic feminisms. The introduction painstakingly elucidates for Danticat's readers (and Clitandre's also) key critical terms and conceptual frames that are integral to the latter's reception of the former's literary work. Clitandre carefully overviews scholarly contributions to and theorizations of diaspora and the field of diaspora studies before coining her own critical vocabulary, including concepts like "diasporic imaginary" (constructed from ideas about "diasporic consciousness" and "home spaces"), the "echo," the "echo chamber," and "écho-monde" and "relational poetics" (both of which are directly indebted to the late Édouard Glissant's writings). In doing so, Clitandre reveals a studied relationship to the interdisciplinary fields of diaspora studies and globalization, as well as French structuralism and [End Page 291] poststructuralism and African diasporic feminisms, demonstrating her intimate knowledge of a wide range of critical theorists (Mikhail Bakhtin, Kobena Mercer, Julia Kristeva, Roland Barthes, Roland Robertson, Arjun Appadurai, Manfred Steger, Saskia Sassen, Éduardo Galeano, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Lacan, Benedict Anderson, Charles Taylor, Édouard Glissant, Homi Bhabha, Simon Gikandi, Paul Gilroy, Caren Kaplan, Stuart Hall, Vijay Mishra, Carole Boyce-Davies, bell hooks, Michelle Wallace, Patricia Hill Collins, and James Clifford) as well as literary critics (Anita Mannur, Carine M. Mardorossian, Yanick Lahens, Myriam Chancy, Belinda Edmondson, Barbara Smith) and creative writers (Maya Angelou, Toni Morrison, Paule Marshall, Audre Lorde, Alice Walker). Chapter 1, "Recall: The Echo Effect of Historical Silences," centers on history and historical echoes of nation and national narratives as recalled in diasporic locations, notably the United States but also the Bahamas, Canada, and other parts of the Caribbean archipelago. As Clitandre powerfully and palpably demonstrates, an understanding of Danticat's literary corpus is not possible without an understanding of her diasporic imaginary and the national, historical narratives that are inextricable from her literary texts. Chapter...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Haitian studiesSame topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207