MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083247486 · doi:10.35784/bud-arch.2160

Time-Cost Relationship for Predicting Construction Duration

2013· article· en· W3083247486 on OpenAlexaff
Agata Czarnigowska, Anna Sobotka

Bibliographic record

VenueBudownictwo i Architektura · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuration (music)Function (biology)Construction managementConstruction engineeringComputer sciencePre-construction servicesOperations researchProject managementEngineeringOperations managementTransport engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Civil engineeringProject planningBusinessSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper aims at creating a model of road construction duration in the function of project qualities including the construction cost. The qualities considered are likely to be defined or possible to be estimated at early stages of project planning, giving no consideration to construction method or organisation of works. Potentially, the model might be applied by construction clients in their feasibility studies. It could also be used for comparing construction duration or construction rate with respect to project qualities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBudownictwo i ArchitekturaSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207