MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083339796 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-5393

Abstract 5393: Association of heat shock proteins as chaperone for STING: A potential link in a key immune activation mechanism revealed by the novel anti-cancer agent PV-10

2020· article· en· W3083339796 on OpenAlexaff
Satbir Thakur, Chunfen Zhang, Laurent Brechenmacher, Luis Murgia-Favela, Aru Narendran

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
Topicinterferon and immune responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStingImmune systemWestern blotTHP1 cell lineCytokineHeat shock proteinCancer researchCell cultureMedicineBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyImmunologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The activation of stimulator of interferon (IFN) genes (STING), an intracellular receptor system located in the endoplasmic reticulum, has been shown to augment antitumor immunity through the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Currently, a number of STING agonists have been developed to treat refractory malignancies. Our previous studies have identified PV-10 (4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2',4',5',7'-tetraiodofluorescein) as a novel therapeutic agent with potent activity following intra-tumoral injection. Here we describe a previously unidentified mechanism by which PV-10 may facilitate sustained immune activation and therapeutic antitumor activity. Methods: The well-established acute monocytic leukemia (AML) cell line THP-1 was used as a model to study STING activation in vitro. Cells were treated with PV-10 and the induction of STING was evaluated by Western blot analysis using cGAMP as a positive control. Proteins that associate with STING in the presence of PV-10 were purified by immunoprecipitation and analyzed by mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS, Mascot database). The culture supernatants from PV-10 treated cells were probed for a panel of 42 immune cytokines using the Bio-Plex multiplex bead-based assay system. Results: We show that the exposure of THP-1 cells to PV-10 leads to the appearance of a new 70-KD STING dimer band detected by specific antibodies. Compared to cGAMP controls no induction of PDL-1 was noted. Mass spectrometric analysis of immuno-precipitates of STING in these cells showed the presence of Heat Shock Proteins (HSP) 60, 70 and 90 as well as Polyadenylate Binding Protein 1 (PABP1) to the dimerized STING complex. The chemokine assays showed specific upregulation of a distinct set of pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic T-cell recruitment cytokines. A peak in the induction of MCP-3 and IFN gamma was seen at 24 hours (2 fold) and an approximately 10-fold increase in IL-6, IL-8 and IP-10 was seen in the 24 hours following exposure to PV-10. A significant increase in MCP-1 levels was also noted. Discussion: The compound PV-10 has been shown to induce tumor necrosis following intra-tumoral injection. Our present data show a possible mechanism of this agent through STING dimerization and HSP association leading to a sustained pro-inflammatory and immune response. We provide experimental data, for the first time, for a role of HSPs in STING-mediated immune activation pathways and the description of an agent that may play a role in effective single-agent immunotherapy or drug combination therapy approaches in future clinical studies. Citation Format: Satbir Thakur, Chunfen Zhang, Laurent Brechenmacher, Luis Murgia-Favela, Aru Narendran. Association of heat shock proteins as chaperone for STING: A potential link in a key immune activation mechanism revealed by the novel anti-cancer agent PV-10 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5393.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicinterferon and immune responsesFrench-language works237,207