Chromium Metal Ion Release During Instrumented Spinal Surgery in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective 2-year study with operative sampling and in-vitro analysis of chromium ions following spinal surgery in children. OBJECTIVES: To measure metal ion levels at preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative times to determine patterns of metal ion release during instrumented spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Raised serum metal ion levels are reported following instrumented spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The authors noted raised chromium levels in patients receiving implants that did not contain chromium. This prompted further work to establish the source. The electrosurgery tips used were discovered to contain 17% chromium. METHODS: Chromium, cobalt, and titanium levels were measured before, during, and after surgery in serum and local intraoperative fluid samples in 11 children undergoing posterior instrumentation for scoliosis. Administered drugs, cell-saver fluids, and intraoperative fluids, both local and intravenous, were investigated to exclude these as sources of chromium ions. An in-vitro study was also performed to elucidate sources of intraoperative chromium ions. RESULTS: High chromium levels were detected in all samples from the wound irrigation fluid prior to insertion of metal implants. Immediate postoperative chromium serum ion levels were also elevated and returned to baseline by day 30. In-vitro sampling of fluids from test models using electrosurgery revealed high levels of chromium ions CONCLUSION.: This finding of high chromium metal ion concentrations in intraoperative and early postoperative samples provides evidence of chromium release during the dissection phase of spinal surgery. This challenges existing beliefs that metal ion release occurs solely due to implants and now implicates the electrosurgery electrode tips as a source of raised chromium ion levels. Thorough irrigation of the operative site after the dissection phase of surgery to both dilute and reduce the intraoperative chromium ion load is suggested. Alternative electrosurgery electrode tips or other methods to coagulate during surgery could be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".