MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083372019 · doi:10.1353/nsj.2020.0008

Newman on Pedagogical Practice

2020· article· en· W3083372019 on OpenAlex
Jane Rupert

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNewman Studies Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCatholicism and Religious Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnlightenmentDilemmaLiberal arts educationHegemonyThe artsPhilosophy of educationPedagogySociologyEpistemologyPhilosophyHigher educationLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Newman on Pedagogical Practice Jane Rupert (bio) In "Elementary Studies," Newman provided a rare instance of pedagogical practice through dramatized oral exams in Greek and Latin and samples of a student's writing. "Elementary Studies" was first published in 1854 and 1855 in issues of The Catholic University Gazette to indicate to prospective students what they might expect on an entrance exam for admission to the new university's Faculty of Philosophy and Letters. Its placement in The Idea of a University after Newman's discussion of the liberal arts' philosophy of mind serves a new purpose by demonstrating how pedagogical practice is an instrument of this philosophy of mind and teaches students to think. However, Newman also indicated in his discussion of education that traditional pedagogical practice was imperiled by the empirical philosophy of mind of Enlightenment philosophers like Locke and Hume. For them, learning to think meant something quite different from its long tradition in the liberal arts. Newman's observations are of present, urgent interest. In recent decades, an empirical pedagogical practice rooted in this same Enlightenment theory of mind has come to exercise an almost complete hegemony in the elementary and secondary schools of countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada. As a Canadian high school teacher of French and English, it was the denaturing of pedagogical practice influenced by the reductionist Enlightenment idea of reason that first drew me to the study of Newman's works on education. In particular, I found a clarification of our present dilemma in his exposition of the foundational principle of the liberal arts as an exercise in two particular kinds of reason, a practice exercised in a continuous tradition since antiquity. As I examine Newman's demonstration of pedagogical practice, I shall begin with a consideration of the nature of these two kinds of reason cultivated in the liberal arts and their distinctive uses of language. Then, I shall examine how these two kinds of reason are exercised in "Elementary Studies." Finally, I shall investigate the aberration of reason represented by Locke that had already infiltrated the liberal arts in Newman's time and which now dominates pedagogy in our own time. [End Page 103] The liberal arts defended by Newman in The Idea of a University taught students to think in the two ways conveyed in the title of his University's Faculty of Philosophy and Letters. Students were taught to think through the kind of reason that understands the causes of things, represented in pedagogy in antiquity by Plato, and through the kind of reason essential to matters requiring deliberation, represented by Isocrates, a rhetorician. Plato represented the practice of considering ideas and principles that illuminate large fields of thought: that is, the Greek theoria, which Newman called philosophic or scientific reasoning. In this kind of reason, the principle articulated by Aristotle that justice is both distributive and retributive illuminates the practice of justice. Books of Euclid's geometry, texts in continuous use from 300 BCE to Newman's day, exercised this same kind of deductive reasoning from initial propositions to consequences. The empirical demonstrations that follow a hypothesis in the modern sciences follow the same pattern of reason. Similarly, in the study of languages the rules of grammar illuminate large areas of usage. Language associated with this kind of reason is characterized by a univocal clarity and accuracy of definition, which stand in contrast to the more subtle use of language in the second kind of reason exercised in the liberal arts. Isocrates, the second pillar of the liberal arts, represents the genus of deliberative reasoning as exercised in the art of rhetoric. Rhetoric locates arguments around an idea. It then organizes effectively the many facets of the argument that lead to decision through the consent of both mind and heart in matters like politics and large social questions. This same genus of reason includes personal judgments informed by converging probabilities, a process of reasoning common to pioneering work in science and to decisions in religious belief that Newman described in his Grammar of Assent. The same genus of reason is also implicit in literature in which recurring human...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.417
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.012 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it