Stochastic Finite Element Analysis Framework for Modelling Electrical Properties of Particle-Modified Polymer Composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Properties such as low specific gravity and cost make polymers attractive for many engineering applications, yet their mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties are typically inferior compared to other engineering materials. Material designers have been seeking to improve polymer properties, which may be achieved by adding suitable particulate fillers. However, the design process is challenging due to countless permutations of available filler materials, different morphologies, filler loadings and fabrication routes. Designing materials solely through experimentation is ineffective given the considerable time and cost associated with such campaigns. Analytical models, on the other hand, typically lack detail, accuracy and versatility. Increasingly powerful numerical techniques are a promising route to alleviate these shortcomings. A stochastic finite element analysis method for predicting the properties of filler-modified polymers is herein presented with a focus on electrical properties, i.e., conductivity, percolation, and piezoresistivity behavior of composites with randomly distributed and dispersed filler particles. The effect of temperature was also explored. While the modeling framework enables prediction of the properties for a variety of filler morphologies, the present study considers spherical particles for the case of nano-silver modified epoxy polymer. Predicted properties were contrasted with data available in the technical literature to demonstrate the viability of the developed modeling approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".