Slab Remnant Recycling and Mantle-Wide Convection: A Separation of Time Scales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two dimensional numerical models of mantle convection in a cylindrical shell provide a possible geodynamic explanation for cold patches in the mantle below India and Mongolia as detected by seismic tomography. We investigate the influence of very high viscosities at mid-mantle and lower-mantle depths, as proposed by Mitrovica and Forte (2004) and Steinberger and Calderwood (2006), on mantle convective flow. Models are considered with and without mineral phase transitions. Our viscosity profiles are depth dependent with deep mantle viscosities increasing to values of 300 times the viscosity of the upper mantle, and then decreasing dramatically on approaching the core-mantle boundary. The decrease of viscosity near the CMB mobilizes the overall mantle-wide flow despite very high mid-mantle viscosities. However, cold detached slabs sinking below continental collisions become captured by the high viscosity interior and circulate slowly for times exceeding 200 Myr. The separation of time scales for mantle-wide flow vs slab circulation, is a consequence of the high viscosity of the mid-mantle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".