MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083432726 · doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e00952

First case report of infective endocarditis associated with Microbacterium maritypicum

2020· article· en· W3083432726 on OpenAlexaff
Eugene Y. H. Yeung, Mashiul Chowdhury, Robert W. Slinger

Bibliographic record

VenueIDCases · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsCanadian Electricity AssociationOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobacteriumVancomycinInfective endocarditisBacteremiaMicrobiologyEndocarditisMedicineGram stainingBacilliGram-Positive CocciTeicoplaninBacteriaAntibioticsBiologySurgeryStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbacterium species are gram positive coryneforms generally considered as a contaminant when identified in gram stain of blood culture, especially when time-to-positivity is longer than 48 h. We encountered a case of infective endocarditis associated with Microbacterium maritypicum bacteremia, which became positive after 48 h of incubation in three out of four bottles. The antimicrobial management is controversial as vancomycin is generally assumed to cover most gram positive bacilli, but our susceptibility result demonstrated minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 μg/mL of vancomycin, indicating non-susceptibility. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of infective endocarditis associated with Microbacterium maritypicum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIDCasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207