Relationship of optical anomalies, zoning, and microtopography in vesuvianite from Jeffrey Mine, Asbestos, Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The role of growth steps in inducing disequilibrium is investigated in crystals of vesuvianite from the Jeffrey mine, Asbestos, Quebec, using optical microscopy, atomic force microscopy, electron microprobe analysis, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The selective uptake of elements Fe and Al by asymmetric growth-steps on three crystallographic forms, {100}, {110}, and {121}, is documented. The prisms {100} and {110} show hillocks that display kinetically controlled oscillatory zoning along growth steps parallel to <010> and <1 1>, but not on vicinal faces defined by [001] steps. Sector-specific zoning of extinction angles and 2V angles indicate different degrees of optical dissymmetrization in crystals spanning a range of growth habits. Unit-cell parameters and the presence of violating reflections confirm sectoral deviations from P4/nnc symmetry in the prismatic sectors. The partial loss of three glide planes follows the pattern expected from order of the cations Al and Fe induced by tangential selectivity at the edge of non-equivalent steps during layer-by-layer growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".