MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083519988 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a6736

Tumefactive Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis: Imaging Findings of a Rare and Underrecognized Neuroinflammatory Disease

2020· article· en· W3083519988 on OpenAlexaff
Suradech Suthiphosuwan, Aditya Bharatha, Charlie Hsu, Amy Lin, John A. Maloney, David G. Muñoz, Cheryl A. Palmer, Anne G. Osborn

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrain biopsyVasculitisDifferential diagnosisPathologyCentral nervous systemStereotactic biopsyBiopsyRadiologyLesionMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV) is a poorly understood neuroinflammatory disease of the CNS affecting the intracranial vasculature. Although PCNSV classically manifests as a multifocal beaded narrowing of the intracranial vessels, some patients may not have angiographic abnormalities. A rare subset of patients with PCNSV present with masslike brain lesions mimicking a neoplasm. In this article, we retrospectively review 10 biopsy-confirmed cases of tumefactive PCNSV (t-PCNSV). All cases of t-PCNSV in our series that underwent CTA or MRA were found to have normal large and medium-sized vessels. T-PCNSV had a variable MR imaging appearance with most cases showing cortical/subcortical enhancing masslike lesion (70%), often with microhemorrhages (80%). Diffusion restriction was absent in all lesions. In summary, normal vascular imaging does not exclude the diagnosis of t-PCNSV. Advanced imaging techniques including MR perfusion and MR spectroscopy failed to demonstrate specific findings for t-PCNSV but assisted in excluding neoplasm in the differential diagnosis. Biopsy remains mandatory for definitive diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207