Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEste ensayo ofrece una historia muy breve de las politicas laborales instrumentadas en nuestro pais durante las ultimas decadas. Subraya la importancia de los “contratos de proteccion patronal”, un instrumento que ha servido para atraer inversion extranjera pero que ha provocado, al mismo tiempo, una violacion constante de los derechos humanos. Consideramos que el capitulo laboral, incluido en el nuevo Acuerdo comercial pactado recientemente entre Estados Unidos, Canada y Mexico, coincide con las metas del gobierno electo en julio pasado encabezado por Lopez Obrador. Las reformas a la Ley Federal del Trabajo a las que se ha obligado nuestro pais pueden conducir a una verdadera democracia sindical, indispensable para un pacto social mas incluyente y beneficioso para los trabajadores. EnglishThis paper offers a very brief history of labor policies in Mexico during the last decades. It stresses the importance of “protection” contracts for outsourcing of foreign companies to Mexico although they suppress human rights. We think that the labor chapter included in the new trade deal among US, Canada and Mexico has coincided with the goals of the government elected last July, headed by Lopez Obrador. Thus, the accorded outcome, a reform of the labor law, may lead towards a real democracy in labor unions, indispensable for a new social pact in Mexico, more inclusive and beneficial for the working class.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".