MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083539572 · doi:10.4000/tvseries.4296

Les séries télévisées médicales étatsuniennes : évolutions, permanences et enjeux de l’« asymétrie réaliste »

2020· article· fr· W3083539572 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTV/Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse « l’asymétrie réaliste » dans les séries télévisées médicales étatsuniennes, c’est-à-dire un choix de focalisation combinant l’hypervisibilité de l’expertise médicale et l’invisibilisation des inégalités d’accès aux soins médicaux. Plus précisément, l’article étudie l’essor du canon sériel médical et l’évolution historique des choix de focalisation de ce genre en s’appuyant sur un corpus de séries médicales produites entre 1950 et nos jours aux États-Unis. L’article étudie également les enjeux épistémiques de l’asymétrie réaliste dans ce genre très populaire et dans le contexte de réception étatsunien, où la question de l’accès aux soins médicaux demeure une inquiétude permanente, notamment pour les plus pauvres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it