Nature and Extent of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Indian Banking Sector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR), are societal initiatives of an organization for the community welfare and development. The purpose of the present study is to highlight the corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian banks for the financial year 2014-15 to 2016-17. The contribution of Indian banks in CSR initiatives has been observed in the form of development of the rural sector, the contribution in basic education, generating more employment opportunities, public healthcare, and sanitation, etc. CSR has been emerged as an important factor in facilitating sustainable growth and valuing the stakeholder and featured as a competitive edge in the banking sector over its rivals and improves the reputation. The results of the study highlighted the compounded CSR spent and sector-wise CSR contributions by the Indian banks during the period of study. A compounded downfall of 7.70 percent has been observed in the growth of the amount required to CSR spent. Simultaneously, the downfall of 8.39 percent in the actual CSR spent has also been recorded in the study. But on the other hand, the amount of CSR spent of all sample banks has been increased by a compound growth of 22.60 percent during the period of study. Besides, the growth analysis of “sector-wise” CSR spent reflected an increase in the compound growth of all sectors by 21.80 percent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".