MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083554083 · doi:10.21105/joss.02343

qMRLab: Quantitative MRI analysis, under one umbrella

2020· article· en· W3083554083 on OpenAlexafffund
Agâh Karakuzu, Mathieu Boudreau, Tanguy Duval, Tommy Boshkovski, Ilana R. Leppert, Jean‐François Cabana, Ian Gagnon, Pascale Béliveau, G. Bruce Pike, Julien Cohen‐Adad, Nikola Stikov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-AppalacheUniversity of CalgaryCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Brain CanadaInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalFondation Institut de Cardiologie de MontréalCanada First Research Excellence FundRéseau en Bio-Imagerie du Quebec
KeywordsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized the way we look at the human body. However, conventional MR scanners are not measurement devices. They produce digital images represented by "shades of grey", and the intensity of the shades depends on the way the images are acquired. This is why it is difficult to compare images acquired at different clinical sites, limiting the diagnostic, prognostic, and scientific potential of the technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Open Source SoftwareSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207