A Prospective Longitudinal Study on the Relationship Between Glucose Fluctuation and Cognitive Function in Type 2 Diabetes: PROPOSAL Study Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although the risk of dementia among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is double that of those without T2DM, the mechanism remains to be elucidated and the glycemic goal to prevent progression of cognitive impairment is unclear. Results from cross-sectional studies suggest that glucose fluctuations are associated with impairment of cognitive function among T2DM patients. Therefore, the aim of the longitudinal study described here is to evaluate the relationships between glucose fluctuation indexes assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and cognitive function among elderly patients with T2DM. METHODS: This will be a prospective, single-center, 2-year longitudinal study in which a total of 100 elderly patients with T2DM showing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will be enrolled. Glucose fluctuations, assessed using the FreeStyle Libre Pro continuous glucose monitoring system (Abbott Laboratories), and results of cognitive tests, namely the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS), will be evaluated at baseline, 1-year visit and 2-year visit. The primary endpoint is the relationships between indexes of glucose fluctuation and change in MoCA and ADAS scores. Secondary endpoints are the relationships between the indexes of glucose fluctuation or cognitive scores and the following: indexes representing intracranial lesions obtained by magnetic resonance imaging and angiography of the head; Geriatric Depression Scale score; Apathy Scale score; carotid intima-media thickness assessed by echography; inflammatory markers; fasting glucose; glycated hemoglobin; blood pressure; and the development of cardiovascular and renal events. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The current study is scheduled for completion in June 2022. The results could lead to the elucidation of novel glycemic goals to prevent the progression of cognitive impairment and/or of relationships between glucose fluctuations and cognitive function among T2DM patients. The findings of the study will be reported in publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000038546).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".