MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3083646126 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-2162

Abstract 2162: KIM–1 mediatesimmune evasioninrenal cell carcinoma

2020· article· en· W3083646126 on OpenAlexaff
Demitra M. Yotis, Bradly Shrum, Marie A. Sarabusky, Lakshman Gunaratnam

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemCancer researchTumor microenvironmentCD8ImmunotherapyT cellBiologyCytotoxic T cellImmunologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common and lethal form of kidney cancer. Cancer immune evasion is a major obstacle for effective immunotherapy in RCC. Mechanisms of immune evasion are characterized by three phenotypes: Immune Inflamed; tumor contains infiltrating T cells which are rendered inactive within the tumor microenvironment due to localized inhibition. Immune Desert; tumor is devoid of activate T cells due to defective antigen presentation, and/or T cell activation. Lastly, Immune Excluded; tumor is surrounded by T cells that are unable to penetrate the parenchyma, caused by immunosuppression within the tumor stroma. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1) is a cell-surface glycoprotein aberrantly expressed in >90% of RCC tumors. The purpose of this study was to determine the pathophysiological significance of KIM-1 in RCC pathogenesis. We generated murine RCC cells (Renca) expressing KIM-1 (KIM-1pos) or control vector (KIM-1neg) using lentiviral transduction. We found that KIM-1 expression on RCC cells promoted more rapid tumor growth when injected contralaterally into syngeneic immunocompetent BALB/c mice (KIM-1neg = 263.75mm3, KIM-1pos = 849.72, p = 0.0149 & KIM-1neg = 0.32g, KIM-1pos = 0.58, p = 0.0229), but not in RAG1-/- immunodeficient BALB/c mice suggesting the KIM-1 promotes tumor growth through evasion of the adapt immune system. When analyzing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) from both tumor groups, we found a relative scarcity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells within the KIM-1pos vs. KIM-1neg tumors. To classify the immune evasion phenotype, we analyzed localization of the immune infiltrate using immunofluorescence within KIM-1pos and KIM-1neg RCC tumors. We found significantly fewer CD3+ cells within the KIM-1pos vs. KIM-1neg tumor parenchyma (KIM-1neg = 3625.78%, KIM-1pos = 272.36%, p = 0.0410). Moreover, CD3+ cells of the KIM-1neg tumors were observed in the parenchyma, whereas CD3+ cells of the KIM-1pos tumors were localized to the tumor stroma. In addition, we observed a higher frequency of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) within the KIM-1pos vs the KIM-1neg tumor parenchyma (KIM-1neg = 0.05, KIM-1pos = 0.19, p = 0.0266). Transcriptomic profiling of both KIM-1pos and KIM-1neg Renca cells suggests that KIM-1 promotes deposition of extracellular matrix (KIM-1neg = -1.21, KIM-1pos = 1.96-fold change), which may contribute to KIM-1-mediated immune evasion Our data suggests that KIM-1 expression in RCC promotes immune evasion by altering the tumor microenvironment resulting in an Immune Excluded phenotype. Citation Format: Demitra M. Yotis, Bradly Shrum, Marie Sarabusky, Lakshman Gunaratnam. KIM–1 mediatesimmune evasioninrenal cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2162.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicRenal cell carcinoma treatment→French-language works237,207→