MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083660315 · doi:10.1111/exd.14189

Severe epidermolysis bullosa simplex phenotype caused by codominant mutations p.Ile377Thr in keratin 14 and p.Gly138Glu in keratin 5

2020· article· en· W3083660315 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mbarka Bchetnia, Jean‐Pascal Allard, Anne‐Marie Boucher‐Lafleur, Tania Cruz Mariño, Audrey Dupéré, Julie Powell, Catherine McCuaïg, Marie‐Ève Bernier, Catherine Laprise

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Dermatology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSkin and Cellular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersFondation du Grand défi Pierre LavoieRare Disease Foundation
KeywordsEpidermolysis bullosa simplexKeratin 5Keratin 14Epidermolysis bullosaMissense mutationKeratinKeratin 6AGenodermatosisPhenotypeEpidermolytic hyperkeratosisBiologyGeneticsMutationPopulationHyperkeratosisKeratin 8DermatologyPathologyGeneMedicineIntermediate filamentCellCytoskeleton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) is a rare skin disease usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. EBS is resulting from mutations in keratin 5 (KRT5) and keratin 14 (KRT14) genes encoding the keratins 5 and 14 proteins expressed in the keratinocytes of the basal layer of the epidermis. To date, seven pathogenic mutations have been reported to be responsible for EBS in the Canadian population from the province of Quebec: p.Pro25Leu, p.Leu150Pro, p.Met327Thr and p.Arg559X in KRT5; p.Arg125Ser, p.Ile377Thr and p.Ile412Phe in KRT14. Here, we present a novel French-Canadian patient diagnosed with EBS confined to the soles but presenting a severe complication form including blisters, hyperkeratosis, skin erosions and toenail abnormalities. Mutation screening was performed by direct sequencing of the entire coding regions of KRT5 and KRT14 genes and revealed the previously reported missense heterozygous mutation c. 1130T > C in KRT14 (p.Ile377Thr). Furthermore, this patient is carrying a second mutation in KRT5, c.413G > A (p.Gly138Glu), which has been linked to an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma in the literature. We suspect an impact of the p.Gly138Glu variant on the EBS phenotype severity of the studied patient. The pathogenicity and consequences of both genetic variations were simulated by in silico tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental DermatologySame topicSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207