MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A 150-year phosphorus budget for the Thames catchment, UK

2020· article· en· W3083663188 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Howden, Fred Worrall, Tim Burt, Helen P. Jarvie, Francesca Pianosi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEutrophicationEnvironmental scienceDrainage basinPhosphorusTonneFertilizerHydrology (agriculture)NutrientAgricultureAgricultural landPopulationEffluentLand useAnimal scienceAgronomyEcologyEnvironmental engineeringGeographyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorus (P) is critical for food production but rising P inputs to agricultural land have contributed to eutrophication of fresh and marine waters. Concurrently, wastewater effluent from increasing populations has also become a major P input to natural waters, particularly in urbanised catchments. This study considers the long-term phosphorus budget of the River Thames catchment from 1867 to the present. We combine databases of agricultural land use, human population and river monitoring to develop a phosphorus budget model for the gauged catchment area (9,948 km2) and identify key inputs, outputs and transfers over the period. We quantify P imports and exports of fertilizer, food, feedstuffs, and industrial products (1867-2017), along with direct discharge of fluvial P at the tidal limit (1936-2017). Net P input to land from animal production was essentially stable at ~1,700 tonnes P until 1940, after which there was a steady rise, peaking at approximately 3,800 tonnes P in the early 1970s. Since then, P inputs to land have fallen to a current stable level of ~2,200 tonnes P. This represents a cumulative net input to land of 350 kT P since 1867. Whilst this input is somewhat counterbalanced by losses to the fluvial system and crop harvest, there is nevertheless a large P legacy in catchment soils. Net inputs from wastewater (urine and faeces) rose steadily from 0.8 kT in 1936 to 2 kT in 2010, whilst the marked change occurred in relation to P in detergents rising from zero in 1950 to a peak of ~2kT in 1987, since when there has been a gradual decline to <1 kT at present. The total wastewater effluent contribution rose from 0.8 kT in 1936 to a peak of 3.4 kT at the end of the 1980s. The Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive (91/271/EEC) enforced enhanced removal of P in wastewater from the early 1990s, which led to an immediate, sharp decrease in wastewater contribution of 1 kT P since when there has been a steady decline to 0.4 kT at present. This has shifted the environmental pathway of wastewater P from discharge to rivers to accumulation in sludge which is now largely disposed of by application to agricultural land thus adding to the P legacy in catchment soils. Our analysis of the Thames P budget will end with a discussion of uncertainties in the P model, and the sensitivity of our overall conclusions to assumptions about model structure and parameters applied to our historical records.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→