MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083800061 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100528

22q11.2 microdeletion and increased risk for type 2 diabetes

2020· article· en· W3083800061 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lily Van, Tracy Heung, Sarah Malecki, Christian Fenn, Andrea Tyrer, Marcos Sanches, Eva W.C. Chow, Erik Boot, Maria Corral, Satya Dash, Susan R. George, Anne S. Bassett

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsMental Health Research CanadaUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkDiabetes CanadaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicinePopulationType 2 diabetesDiGeorge syndromeOdds ratioRisk factorHypoparathyroidismPediatricsInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyPsychiatryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The 22q11.2 microdeletion is the pathogenic copy number variation (CNV) associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS, formerly known as DiGeorge syndrome). Familiar endocrinological manifestations include hypoparathyroidism and hypothyroidism, with recent elucidation of elevated risk for obesity in adults. In this study, we aimed to determine whether adults with 22q11.2DS have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We studied the effect of the 22q11.2 microdeletion on risk for T2D, defined by history and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), using weighted survey data from the adult Canadian population (based on n = 11,874) and from a clinical cohort of adults with 22q11.2DS (n = 314), aged 1769 years. Binomial logistic regression models accounted for age, sex, non-European ethnicity, family history of T2D, obesity, and antipsychotic medication use. Findings: The 22q11.2 microdeletion was a significant independent risk factor for T2D (OR 244, 95% CI 139431), accounting for other factors (p < 00001). All factors except sex were also significant within 22q11.2DS. The median age at diagnosis of T2D was significantly younger in 22q11.2DS than in the Canadian population sample (32 vs 50 years, p < 00001). In adults without T2D, HbA1c was significantly higher in 22q11.2DS than the population (p = 0042), after accounting for younger age of the 22q11.2DS group. Interpretation: The results support the 22q11.2 microdeletion as a novel independent risk factor and potential model for early onset T2D. The findings complement emerging evidence that rare CNVs may contribute to risk for T2D. The results have implications for precision medicine and research into the underlying pathogenesis of T2D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207