MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083845621 · doi:10.23952/jano.3.2021.3.01

The fun is finite: Douglas-Rachford and Sudoku puzzle – Finite termination and local linear convergence

2021· article· en· W3083845621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert Tovey, Jingwei Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied and Numerical Optimization · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsConvergence (economics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsCalculus (dental)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the Douglas-Rachford splitting method has been shown to be effective at solving many non-convex optimization problems. In this paper, a local convergence analysis for nonconvex feasibility problems is presented and both finite termination and local linear convergence are obtained. For a generalization of the Sudoku puzzle, it is proved that the local linear rate of convergence of Douglas-Rachford is exactly 5 5 and independent of puzzle size. For the s-queens problem, it is proved that Douglas-Rachford converges after a finite number of iterations. Numerical results on solving Sudoku puzzles and s-queens puzzles are provided to support our theoretical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied and Numerical OptimizationSame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207