Development of a Novel Radiant Floor System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radiant floor systems have the potential to reduce energy consumption and the carbon footprint of buildings. They exhibit quiet operation, minimal airborne dust production, and furniture space savings. Traditional radiant floor heating systems consist of a heat source-hot water pipes or electrical heating wires, embedded in concrete and other building materials. However, traditional radiant floor heating systems are more expensive than conventional forced-air systems, and there is still potential for improved heat transfer efficiency with novel design improvements. Also, they cannot be easily retrofitted and the tendency of concrete to hold heat makes them less responsive to fluctuations in thermal loads. This study analyzed a novel radiant panel configuration comprising a metal plate with small spikes that can be pressed into cement board or wood. The spikes can serve two purposes they can bind materials together reducing manufacturing costs and improve heat transfer. The proposed radiant panel is easy to retrofit as it is relatively thin (approximately two inches) and the top layer utilizes hardwood. This top layer is structurally sufficient to take the impact from building occupants. The bottom most layer of the proposed radiant configuration is subfloor plywood which acts as insulation for minimizing the heat transmitted into the ground.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".