MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083885575 · doi:10.32393/csme.2020.1274

Linear Position-Based Visual Predictive Control

2020· article· en· W3083885575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Canadian Mechanical Engineering. Volume 3 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModel predictive controlPosition (finance)Position paperArtificial intelligenceComputer visionControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although position-based visual servoing (PBVS) scheme guarantees the global asymptotic stability and unlike the image-based visual servoing (IBVS), some issues such as image singularities and camera retreat problems do not emerge within the control procedure but, its sensitivity to camera calibration errors must be addressed. This paper presents a novel positionbased visual predictive control (PVPC) method based on the internal model control (IMC) scheme to not only overcome the issues caused by camera calibration errors, but also to handle the available constraints in the visual servoing procedure. In addition, the optimized control signal puts less pressure on the actuators while the camera goes through the smoother spatial trajectory. In order to verify the functionality and efficiency of the proposed approach, some simulation results are presented .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it