MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3083902533 · doi:10.1128/jvi.00623-20

A Novel Taxon of Monosegmented Double-Stranded RNA Viruses Endemic to Triclad Flatworms

2020· article· en· W3083902533 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffrey T. A. Burrows, Delphine Depierreux, Max L. Nibert, Bret J. Pearson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsPlanarianFlatwormBiologyRNATaxonPlanariaTurbellariaRNA silencingZoologyEvolutionary biologyCell biologyVirologyRegeneration (biology)EcologyGeneticsRNA interferenceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planarians are freshwater flatworms, related more distantly to tapeworms and flukes, and have been developed as models to study the molecular mechanisms of stem cell biology and tissue regeneration. These worms live in aquatic environments, where they are likely to encounter a variety of viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotic organisms with pathogenic potential. How the planarian immune system has evolved to cope with these potential pathogens is not well understood, and only two types of planarian viruses have been described to date. Here, we report discovery and inaugural studies of a novel taxon of dsRNA viruses in five different planarian species. The virus in the best-characterized model species, Schmidtea mediterranea , appears to persist long term in that host while avoiding endogenous antiviral or RNAi mechanisms. The S. mediterranea virus-host system thus seems to offer opportunity for gaining new insights into host defenses and their evolution in an important lab model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VirologySame topicPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationFrench-language works237,207