Heaping the Pelion of Vancomycin on the Ossa of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus <i>aureus</i>: Back to Basics in Clinical Care and Guidelines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(See the Viewpoints Article by Dilworth et al on pages e675–81.) In Greek mythology, the Titans piled Mount Pelion and Mount Ossa upon Olympus to scale the dwellings of the Gods but were overwhelmed by Zeus. “Heaping Pelion upon Ossa” thus refers to making monumental efforts that nevertheless fail to achieve their objective. This aphorism applies well to the never-ending struggle of having medical guidelines accelerate the translation of research into clinical practice, improve the quality and safety of healthcare, and reduce inappropriate practice variation [1]. The Viewpoint article by Dilworth et al that appears in this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseaseshelps underscore this dilemma [2]. Some years ago, national practice guidelines were published recommending that vancomycin dosing be adjusted to maintain trough (Cmin) serum concentrations between 15 and 20 µg/mL [3]. The evidence supporting this recommendation was based on hypothesis-generating,...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.023 | 0.024 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".